Histopathological assessment of a two-stage reconstructive procedure of the infected Charcot foot
Abstract
Introduction
Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy (CN) can be complicated by osteomyelitis (OM). Surgery is a standard procedure to treat OM including debridement and interposition of antibiotic-loaded cement (ABLC) spacer. The course of CN and OM was investigated on a histopathological level.
Materials and methods
Diabetic patients (n = 15) suffering from CN and midfoot OM underwent surgical debridement and interposition of ABLC was interposed. 6 weeks later, ABLC was removed and bone samples were taken again. Histopathological Charcot Score (HCS), Histopathological Osteomyelitis Evaluation Score (HOES) and microbiological assessment were used to evaluate osteomyelitic and neuroosteoarthropathic activity at both time points.
Results
Interposition of ABLC leads to microbiological/histopathological eradication of OM in 73%/87% of patients. CN activity—measured by HCS—could be reduced from moderate to low activity by ABLC spacer and correlated with HOES.
Conclusions
CN activity could be reduced by surgery. It can be suggested that neuroosteoarthropathic activity measured by HCS is triggered by OM.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution .
Access options
Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
References
1.
Sanders LJ, Frykberg RG (1991) Diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy: the Charcot foot. In: Frykberg RG (ed) The high risk foot in diabetes mellitus. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 297–338
2.
Dhawan V, Spratt KF, Pinzur MS, Baumhauer J, Rudicel S, Saltzman CL (2005) Reliability of AOFAS diabetic foot questionnaire in Charcot arthropathy: stability, internal consistency, and measurable difference. Foot Ankle Int 26:717–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070502600910
Article PubMed Google Scholar
3.
Gazis A, Pound N, Macfarlane R, Treece K, Game F, Jeffcoate W (2004) Mortality in patients with diabetic neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot foot). Diabet Med 21:1243–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01215.x
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
4.
Pakarinen TK, Laine HJ, Maenpaa H, Mattila P, Lahtela J (2009) Long-term outcome and quality of life in patients with Charcot foot. Foot Ankle Surg 15:187–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2009.02.005
Article PubMed Google Scholar
5.
Rogers LC, Frykberg RG, Armstrong DG, Boulton AJ, Edmonds M, Van GH, Hartemann A, Game F, Jeffcoate W, Jirkovska A, Jude E, Morbach S, Morrison WB, Pinzur M, Pitocco D, Sanders L, Wukich DK, Uccioli L (2011) The Charcot foot in diabetes. Diabetes Care 34:2123–2129. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0844
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
6.
Gratwohl V, Jentzsch T, Schoni M, Kaiser D, Berli MC, Boni T, Waibel FWA (2021) Long-term follow-up of conservative treatment of Charcot feet. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03881-5
Article PubMed Google Scholar
7.
Rubin LG, Jacobs AM (2015) Osteomyelitis associated with charcot arthropathy. Osteomyelitis of the foot and ankle 157–165
8.
Berli M, Vlachopoulos L, Leupi S, Boni T, Baltin C (2017) Treatment of Charcot Neuroarthropathy and osteomyelitis of the same foot: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:460. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1818-4
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
9.
Mak MF, Stern R, Assal M (2015) Masquelet technique for midfoot reconstruction following osteomyelitis in charcot diabetic neuropathy: a case report. JBJS Case Connect 5:e281–e285. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.N.00112
Article Google Scholar
10.
Wirth SH, Viehofer AF, Tondelli T, Hartmann R, Berli MC, Boni T, Waibel FWA (2020) Mid-term walking ability after Charcot foot reconstruction using the Ilizarov ring fixator. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:1909–1917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03407-5
Article PubMed Google Scholar
11.
Reinke C, Lotzien S, Yilmaz E, Hanusrichter Y, Ull C, Baecker H, Schildhauer TA, Gessmann J (2021) Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov fixator in compromised hosts: an analysis of 19 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03751-0
Article PubMed Google Scholar
12.
Liu X, Ding G, Zhou D, Xiang L (2018) Antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer usage combined with membrane induction in infected gap non-unions: a case series. Pak J Med Sci 34:1088–1093. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.345.14569
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
13.
Masquelet AC, Begue T (2010) The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction of long bone defects. Orthop Clin North Am 41:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2009.07.011 (table of contents)
Article PubMed Google Scholar
14.
Illgner U, Mehlhorn AT, Osada N, Krenn V (2019) Histopathological Charcot score on intraoperative tissue samples from the foot: a prospective investigation. Orthopade 48:693–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-019-03769-8
Article PubMed Google Scholar
15.
Tiemann A, Hofmann GO, Krukemeyer MG, Krenn V, Langwald S (2014) Histopathological Osteomyelitis Evaluation Score (HOES)—an innovative approach to histopathological diagnostics and scoring of osteomyelitis. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW 3:Doc08. https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000049
17.
Fitz-Henry J (2011) The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:185–187. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870811X565070
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
18.
Mehlhorn AT, Ugland KI, Horterer H, Gottschalk O, Sudkamp N, Walther M (2019) A high-profile thread with grit-blasted and acid-etched surface reduces loosening of medial column fusion bolt in instable Charcot foot. Foot Ankle Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.08.004
Article PubMed Google Scholar
19.
Salamon ML, Pinney SJ, Van Bergeyk A, Hazelwood S (2006) Surgical anatomy and accuracy of percutaneous achilles tendon lengthening. Foot Ankle Int 27:411–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602700604
Article PubMed Google Scholar
20.
Coughlin MJ, Grimes JS, Traughber PD, Jones CP (2006) Comparison of radiographs and CT scans in the prospective evaluation of the fusion of hindfoot arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 27:780–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602701004
Article PubMed Google Scholar
21.
Jones CP, Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS (2006) Prospective CT scan evaluation of hindfoot nonunions treated with revision surgery and low-intensity ultrasound stimulation. Foot Ankle Int 27:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602700401
Article PubMed Google Scholar
22.
Cerrato RA, Aiyer AA, Campbell J, Jeng CL, Myerson MS (2014) Reproducibility of computed tomography to evaluate ankle and hindfoot fusions. Foot Ankle Int 35:1176–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714544521
Article PubMed Google Scholar
23.
Stupina TA, Sudnitsyn AS, Subramanyam KN, Migalkin NS, Kirsanova AY, Umerjikar S (2019) Applicability of histopathological osteomyelitis evaluation score (HOES) in chronic osteomyelitis of the foot—a feasibility study. Foot Ankle Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.03.008
Article PubMed Google Scholar
24.
Schade VL, Roukis TS (2010) The role of polymethylmethacrylate antibiotic-loaded cement in addition to debridement for the treatment of soft tissue and osseous infections of the foot and ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg 49:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2009.06.010
Article PubMed Google Scholar
25.
Eschler A, Gradl G, Wussow A, Mittlmeier T (2015) Prediction of complications in a high-risk cohort of patients undergoing corrective arthrodesis of late stage Charcot deformity based on the PEDIS score. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:349. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0809-6
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
26.
Eschler A, Gradl G, Wussow A, Mittlmeier T (2015) Late corrective arthrodesis in nonplantigrade diabetic charcot midfoot disease is associated with high complication and reoperation rates. J Diabetes Res 2015:246792. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/246792
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
27.
Mehlhorn AT, Walther M, Iblher N, Sudkamp NP, Schmal H (2016) Complication assessment and prevention strategies using midfoot fusion bolt for medial column stabilization in Charcot’s osteoarthropathy. Foot (Edinb) 29:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2016.10.005
Article Google Scholar
28.
Aragon-Sanchez J, Lazaro-Martinez JL, Quintana-Marrero Y, Alvaro-Afonso FJ, Hernandez-Herrero MJ (2013) Charcot neuroarthropathy triggered and complicated by osteomyelitis. How limb salvage can be achieved. Diabet Med 30:e229–e232. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12191
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
29.
Butt DA, Hester T, Bilal A, Edmonds M, Kavarthapu V (2015) The medial column synthes midfoot fusion bolt is associated with unacceptable rates of failure in corrective fusion for Charcot deformity: results from a consecutive case series. Bone Joint J 97-B:809–813. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.34844
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
30.
Lowery NJ, Woods JB, Armstrong DG, Wukich DK (2012) Surgical management of Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot and ankle: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int 33:113–121. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2012.0113
Article PubMed Google Scholar
31.
Hankemeier S, Grassel S, Plenz G, Spiegel HU, Bruckner P, Probst A (2001) Alteration of fracture stability influences chondrogenesis, osteogenesis and immigration of macrophages. J Orthop Res 19:531–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(00)00044-9
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
32.
Toben D, Schroeder I, El Khassawna T, Mehta M, Hoffmann JE, Frisch JT, Schell H, Lienau J, Serra A, Radbruch A, Duda GN (2011) Fracture healing is accelerated in the absence of the adaptive immune system. J Bone Miner Res 26:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.185
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
33.
Wang H, Li X, Tomin E, Doty SB, Lane JM, Carney DH, Ryaby JT (2005) Thrombin peptide (TP508) promotes fracture repair by up-regulating inflammatory mediators, early growth factors, and increasing angiogenesis. J Orthop Res 23:671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.10.002
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
34.
Claes L, Recknagel S, Ignatius A (2012) Fracture healing under healthy and inflammatory conditions. Nat Rev Rheumatol 8:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2012.1